md-medicaldata

Authors

 

Biljana Lazović¹, Radmila Dmitrović¹, Isidora Simonović¹, Antonio M. Esquinas<sup>1,2

1</sup>Department of Pulmonology, University Clinical Center „Zemun” e-mail: lazovic.biljana@gmail.com; radadmitrovic94@gmail.com;
¹ Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain; e-mail: antmesquinas@gmail.com

 

UDK: 616.98:578.834
615.816

The paper was received / Rad primljen: 11.09.2021.

Accepted / Rad prihvaćen: 30.10.2021.

 

Correspondence to:

Biljana Lazović
University Clinical Center „Zemun“
Belgrade, Serbia
Vukova 9, Zemun, 11080 Belgrade
Self-phone: +381 62212040
e-mail: lazovic.biljana@gmail.com

 

 

Abstract

 

Introduction: Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) refers to the administration of ventilatory support without using an invasive artificial airway, endotracheal, or tracheostomy tubeThe use of NIV worldwide is on the rise, and the number of indications increases every day, especially its use in SARS-CoV2 infection where thereis still uncertainty about its effectiveness. Materials and methods: We searched three electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library withthe following keywords: “NIV and COVID19” OR“SARS-CoV-2 and NIV” OR “NIV failure in COVID19 ”, and “NIV in respiratory failure during COVID19”. We found 56 papers of which 21 were included in the study. In the table, we present significant data from retrospective, observational and cross-sectional studies related to the application of NIV in COVID19, the countries where the studies were conducted, the median age of respondents, the number of respondents on NIV, and its failure. Conclusion:According to available data, the NIV failure ranges between 10,93% to 74% depending on the number of respondents who were included in the research. NIV continues to be the method of choice in the treatment of COVID19 patients but its efficacy should be examined through more studies.

 

Keywords:

COVID19, noninvasive ventilation, failure, epidemiology

 

 

 

Sažetak

 

Uvod: Neinvazivna ventilacija (NIV) predstavlja primenu ventilatorne podrške bez upotrebe invazivnih, arteficijalnih disajnih puteva, endotrahealne kanile ili traheostome. Upotreba NIV-a širom sveta je u porastu a broj indikacija se povećava svakim danom, posebno je značajna njegova primena kod SARS-CoV2 infekcije gde još uvek postoji nedoumica u pogledu njegove efikasnosti. Materijal i metode: Pretražili smo tri elektronske baze: PubMed, Embase iCochrane Librarysa sledećim ključnim rečima: “NIV i COVID19” ili “SARS-CoV2 i NIV” ili “neuspeh NIV-a u COVID19” i “NIV u respiratornoj insuficijenciji tokom COVID19”. Pretražili smo 56 radova od kojih je 21 uključen u studiju. Tabelarno smo prikazali podatke iz retrospektivnih, opservacionih i studija preseka vezanih za primenu NIV-a u COVID19 infekciji, zemlje u kojima su studije sprovedene, prosečnu starost ispitanika, broj ispitanika kod kojih se primenjivao NIV i njegov neuspeh u primeni. Zaključak: Prema dostupnim podacima neuspeh u primeni NIV-a kreće se između 10,93% i 74% u zavisnosti od broja ispitanika koji su bili uključeni u istraživanja. NIV je i dalje metod izbora u lečenju pacijenata sa COVID19 infekcijom ali njegovu efikasnost treba ispitati kroz više studija.

Ključne reči:

COVI19, neinvazivna ventilacija, neuspeh, epidemilologija

 

 

 

 

References:

1. Dolinaj V, Lončar T, Božić T, Karišik M, Marković D, Janjević D. Neinvazivna mehanička ventilacija pluća. SJAIT. 2014;36:97-101
2. Esquinas AM, Pravinkumar SE, Scala R, Gay P, Soroksky A, Girault C, et al. Noninvasive mechanical ventilation in high-risk pulmonary infection: a clinical review. Eur Respir Rev. 2014;23:427-38
3. Mohan V, Tauseen Ra. Spontaneous pneumomediastinum in COVID19. BMJ Case Rep. 2020;13:e236519
4. Soo Hoo GW. Noninvasive ventilation. Updated: June 18, 2020. Available from: https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/304235-overview(accessed 3 December 2020).
5. PardoJr M. Noninvasive ventilation. Critical Care Secrets (Fourth Edition). 2007.
6. Popat B, Jones AT. Invasive and noninvasive mechanical ventilation. Medicine (Abingdon). 2012;40(6):298-304 
7. Lazovic B, Dmitrovic R, Simonovic I, Esquinas AM. Baseline physiological measurements: respiratory rate, spontaneous breathing, respiratory effort, and work of breathing. In: Esquinas AM. Principles and practices of non-invasive mechanical ventilation monitoring. From intensive care to home care. New York: Nova Science Publisher; 2021. p. 01-07
8. QUEDASP/SICCN/SWAPNET. Management of respiratory failure in the response to COVID19. Available from: https://www.health.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0037/949582/covid-19-management-respiratory-failure.pdf
9. Rismanbaf A. Potential treatments for COVID-19: a narrative literature review. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2020;8(1):e29
10. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y,et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):497-506
11. Chowdhury SD, Oommen AM. Epidemiology of COVID19. J Dig Endosc. 2020;11(1):3-7
12. Carter C, Aedy H, Notter J. COVID-19 disease: Noninvasive ventilation and higher frequency nasal oxygenation. Clinics in Integrated Care. 2020;1: 100006 
13. Di Domenico SL, Coen D, Bergamaschi M, Albertini V, Ghezzi L, Cazzaniga MM, et al. Clinical characteristics and respiratory support of 310 COVID19 patients, diagnosed at the emergency room: a single-center retrospective study. Intern Emerg Med. 2020;11: 1-10
14. Gundem T,Olasveengen TM, Hovda KE, Gaustad K,Schøndorf C, Rostrup M, et al. Ventilation support for hypoxemic intensive care patients with covid-19. Tidsskr Nor Legenforen. 2020. Available from:https://tidsskriftet.no/2020/07/originalartikkel/ventilasjonsstotte-hypoksemiske-intensivpasienter-med-covid-19(accessed 3 December 2020).
15. Brusasco C, Corradi F, Di Domenica A, Raggi F, Timossi G, Santori G, et al. Continous positive airway pressure in Covid-19 patients with moderate-to-severe respiratory failure. Eur Respir J. 2020;8: 2002524
16. Avdeev SN, Yaroshetskiy AI, Tsareva NA, Trushenko NV, Nekludova GV, Chikina NV, et al. Noninvasive ventilation for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in patients with COVID-19. Am J Emerg Med. 2020 [Epub ahead of print] 
17. Bastoni D, Poggiali A, Vercelli A, Demichele E, Tinelli V, Iannicelli T,et al et al. Prone positioning in patients treated with non-invasive ventilation for COVID-19 pneumonia in an Italian emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2020;37(9):565-566
18. Zheng Yi, Sun LJ, Xu M, Pan J, Zhang YT, Fang XL, et al. Clinical characteristics of 34 COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care unit in Hangzhou, China. J Zheijang Univ Sci B. 2020;21(5):378-87 
19. Rahim F, Amin S, Noor M, Bahadur S, Gul H, Mahmood A, et al. Mortality of patients with severe COVID-19 in the intensive care unit: an observational study from a major COVID-19 receiving hospital. Cureus. 2020;12(10):e10906 
20. Liu L, Xie J, Wu W, Chen H, Li S, He H, et al. A simple nomogram for predicting failure of non-invasive respiratory strategies in adults with COVID19: a retrospective multicentre study. Lancet Digit Health. 2021;3(3):e166-e174
21. Diaz de Teran T, Gonzales Martinez M, Banfi P, Garuti G, Ferraioli G, Russo G, et al. Management of patients with severe acute respiratory failure due to SARS-CoV2 pneumonia with non-invasive ventilatory support outside Intensive Care Unit
    

PDF: 13-MD-Vol 13 No 3-4 Sept-Dec 2021_Lazović B. et al.pdf