md-medicaldata

Authors

 

Marijana Srećković¹ , Dušan Backović² , Predrag Kuzmanović^1,3 , Bojan Damnjanović¹ , Slobodanka Radojević⁴ , Igor Dragičević<sup>4,5

1</sup>Akademija strukovnih studija Šabac, Odsek za medicinske i poslovno-tehnološke studije, Srbija
²Institut za higijenu i medicinsku ekologiju, Medicinski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu, Srbija
³Departman za fiziku, Prirodno-matematički fakultet, Univerzitet u Novom Sadu, Srbija
⁴Zavod za javno zdravlje Šabac, Srbija
⁵Fakultet zdravstvenih nauka, Evropski univerzitet Brčko distrikt, Bosna i Hercegovina

 

UDK: 616.45-089-06(497.11)"2012/2016"

The paper was received / Rad primljen: 21.05.2020

Accepted / Rad prihvaćen: 22.06.2020.

 

Correspondence to:

Marijana Srećković
Akademija strukovnih studija Šabac,
Odsek za medicinske i poslovno-tehnološke studije, Srbija
Vladimira Vasića 9, 15 000 Šabac
Telefon: +381638369898
e-mail: drsreckovicmaja@gmail.com

 

 

Sažetak

 

Uvod: Buka deluje višestruko štetnona zdravlje čoveka, uzrokujući zamor i smanjenje radne sposobnosti, ometa sporazumevanje, odmor i spavanje. Bolnička i školska sredina su akustičke zone naselja u kojima postoji visok rizik ispoljavanja ovih zdravstvenih efekata buke. Cilj: Ispitati izlaganje komunalnoj buci u bolničkoj i školskoj zoni grada Šapca u odnosu na zakonski ustanovljene granične vrednosti. Materijal i metode: Sprovedena je retrospektivna analiza rezultata merenja nivoa buke u blizini osnovnih škola i zdravstvenih ustanova na teritoriji grada Šapca, koje je sproveo Zavod za javno zdravlje Šabac u periodu od 2016. do 2018. godine. Kretanje nivoa buke u posmatranom periodu je predstavljeno linearnim trend modelom. Rezultati: Merna mesta analiziranih lokacija se nalaze pored glavnih gradskih saobraćajnica. Prekoračenja ekvivalentnih nivoa buke u odnosu na granične vrednosti ubolničkoj akustičkoj zonibila suod 13 do 15 dB danju i od 16 do 20 dB noću. U školskoj akustičkoj zoni prekoračenja graničnih vrednosti buke su bila od 8 dB do 13 dB danju i od 6 dB do 13 dB noću. Zabeležen je linearni godišnji trend rasta ekvivalentnih nivoa buke i to za 1,5 dB danju i za  i 1 dB noću. Zaključak: Na osnovu dobijenih rezultata I dosadašnjih naučnih saznanja iz ove oblasti, može se zaključiti da zabeleženi nivoi buke u Šapcu mogu predstavljati factor rizika za zdravlje vulnerabilnih grupa stanovništva u bolničkoj i školskoj akustičkoj zoni.

                                

 

 

 

Ključne reči:

ekvivalentni nivo buke, zdravstvene ustanove, osnovne škole, životna sredina

 

 

Abstract

 

Introduction: Noise affects human health in many ways, causing fatigue and reduced work ability andinterfering with communication, rest and sleep. In the hospital and school acoustic residential zonesthere is a raised risk of these health effects of noise. Objective: Investigation of exposure to communal noise in the hospital and school zones of the city of Šabac in relation to the established limit values. Material end methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the results of noise measurements around primary schools and health institutions in  the city of Šabac, from 2016 to 2018. A linear trend model was used to present yearly changes of noise levels in the observed period. Results: The measuring points at the analyzed locations were close the main roads. In the hospital acoustic zone the limit values of noise were exceeded by13-15 dB during day and by 16-20 dB during night. In the school acoustic zone, the limit noise values were exceeded by 8 dB to 13 dB during day and by 6 dB to 13 dB during night. Only in one school-yard noise levels did not exceed the limits, We found anincreasing linear trend of day and night noise levels by 1.5 dB and 1 dB per year,respectively. Conclusion: Based on the obtained results and previous scientific knowledge in this field, it may be concluded that the recorded noise levels in the hospital and school zones of  Šabac may be a health riskfor vulnerable groups of people.

 

 

Key words:

noise, health facilities, primary schools, environment

 

 

References:

1. Belojević G. Buka u životnoj sredini i zdravlje. U: Higijena sa medicinskom ekologijom, Urednik Jorga J. Medicinski fakultet u Beogradu, Beograd, 2014;65-73.
2. Belojević G, Paunović K. Recent advances in research on non-auditory effects of community noise. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2016;144(1-2):94-8.
3. Bijelović S. Činioci životne sredine kao pokazatelji uticaja na zdravlje ljudi [doktorska disertacija]. Novi Sad: Univerzitet u Novom Sadu, Medicinski fakultet; 2011.
4. Paunović K, Belojević G, Jakovljević B. Noise annoyance is related to the presence of urban public transport. Sci Total Environ. 2014;481:479-87.
5. Basner M, Babisch W, Davis A, Brink M, Clark C, Janssen S et al. Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health. The Lancet.2014;383(9925) 1 325–1 332.
6. Sørensen M, Andersen Z J, Nordsborg R B, Becker T, Tjønneland A et al. Long-term exposure to road traffic noise and incident diabetes: A cohort study.Environmental Health Perspectives.2013;121(2) 217–222.
7. Burden of disease from environmental noise. Quantification of healthy life years lost in Europe.C openhagen, World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, 2011. Dostupno na: https://www.who.int/quantifying_ehimpacts/publications/e94888.pdf.
8. Abbaspour M, Golmohammadi R, Nassiri P, Mahjub H. An Investigation on Time Interval Optimization of Traffic Noise Measurement. Journal of low frequency noise vibration & active control 2006;25(4): 267-273.
9. Mansouri NA, Pour Mahabadian M, Ghasemkhani M. Road Traffic Noise in Downtown Area of Tehran, Iranian Journal Of Environmental Health Science And Engineering. 2006;3(4): 261-266.
10. Noise in Europe 2014. Luxembourg, European Environment Agency, 2014. Dostupno na: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/noise-in-europe-2014.
11. Good Practice Guide for Strategic Noise Mapping and the Production of Associated Data on Noise Exposure. European Commission Working Group Assessment of Exposure to Noise, version 2, 2007. Dostupno na: https://www.lfu.bayern.de/laerm/eg_umgebungslaermrichtlinie/doc/good_practice_guide_2007.pdf.
12. Zakon o zaštiti od bukeu  životnoj sredini (''Sl. gl. RS'' 36/2009; 88/2010).
13. Uredba o indikatorima buke, graničnim vrednostima, metodama za ocenjivanje indikatora buke, uznemiravanja i štetnih efekata buke u životnoj sredini (''Sl. gl. RS'' 75/2010).
14. Pravilnik o metodama merenja buke, sadržini i obimu izveštaja o merenju buke (''Sl. gl. RS'' 72/2010).
15. Pravilnik o uslovima koje mora da ispunjava stručna organizacija za merenje buke (''Sl.gl. RS'' 75/2010).
16. Clark C and Paunovic K. WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: A Systematic Review on Environmental Noise and Quality of Life, Wellbeing and Mental Health. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018; 29;15(11).
17. Ali SA. Study effects of school noise on learning achievement and annoyance in Assiut city, Egypt. 2013;74(4):602–606.
18. Stansfeld S and Clark C. Health Effects of Noise Exposure in Children. Current Environmental Health Reports. 2015;2(2):171–8.
19. Ljung R, Sörqvist P, Hygge S. Effects of road traffic noise and irrelevant speech on children's reading and mathematical performance. Noise Health. 2009;11(45):194-8.
20. Persson R, Björk J, Ardö J, Albin M and Jakobsson K. Trait anxiety and modeled exposure as determinants of self-reported annoyance to sound, air pollution and other environmental factors in the home. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health. 2007;81(2):179-91.
21. Grossman MN, Anderson SL, Worku A, Marsack W, Desai N, Tuvilleja A, et al. Awakenings? Patient and Hospital Staff Perceptions of Nighttime Disruptions and Their Effect on Patient Sleep.J Clin Sleep Med. 2017;15;13(2):301-306.
22. Andrade KP, Oliveira LLA de, Souza R de P and Matos IM de. Noise level measurement and its effects on hospital employees based on complaint reports. Revista CEFAC.2016; (6):1379.
23. Cantuaria ML, Usemann J, Proietti E, Blanes-Vidal V, Dick B, Flück CE, et al. Glucocorticoid metabolites in newborns: A marker for traffic noise related stress? Environment International. 2018;117:319–26.
24. Savale PA. Effect of noise pollution on human being: Its prevention and control. J. Environ. Res. Develop. 2014; 8 (4):1026-1036.
25. Golmohammadi R, Abbaspour M, Nassiri P and Mahjub H. A compact model for predicting road traffic noise. Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering 2009. 6(3):181-186.
26. Brown B, Rutherford P and Crawford P. Review: The role of noise in clinical environments with particular reference to mental health care: A narrative review. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2015;52:1514–24.
27. Iyendo TO. Sound as a supportive design intervention for improving health care experience in the clinical ecosystem: A qualitative study. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice. 2017;29:58–96.
28. Garside J, Stephenson J, Curtis H, Morrell M, Dearnley C andAstin F.Are noise reduction interventions effective in adult ward settings? A systematic review and meta analysis. Appl Nurs Res. 2018;44:6-17.
29. Shield B, Conetta R, Dockrell J, Connolly D, Cox T, Mydlarz C. A survey of acoustic conditions and noise levels in secondary school classrooms in England. J AcoustSoc Am. 2015;137(1):177-88.
30. Zivadinovic E, Jevtic M and Bijelovic S. Buka u životnoj sredini u Novom Sadu 1985-2016. Medicinski Pregled. 2018; (3):137.
    
    

PDF Srećković M. et al • MD-Medical Data 2020;12(2): 091-095